How to Make Photo Collages That Look Professional (Not Like 2010)

Last month, a client handed me a USB drive containing what she called her "vision board collage" for her wedding invitations. When I opened the file, I physically winced. Comic Sans labels. Clipart borders. Photos at seven different resolutions crammed together with drop shadows that would make a 2010 scrapbooking forum moderator proud. She'd spent 14 hours on it.

I'm Marcus Chen, and I've been a visual designer for luxury brands for the past 11 years. I've art-directed campaigns for companies you'd recognize, designed album covers that went platinum, and created collages for editorial spreads in publications with circulations over 500,000. But here's what most people don't know: the collage work I do now looks nothing like what I created even five years ago, and it's worlds apart from the aesthetic that dominated the early 2010s.

The collage renaissance we're experiencing right now isn't about throwing more elements onto a canvas. It's about restraint, intentionality, and understanding that negative space is just as important as the images themselves. In this guide, I'm going to walk you through the exact process I use to create collages that clients pay $3,000-$8,000 for, and show you how to avoid the dated traps that scream "I learned this from a 2010 YouTube tutorial."

Understanding Why 2010-Era Collages Look Dated (And What Changed)

Before we dive into technique, you need to understand what made early 2010s collages look the way they did. It wasn't just bad taste—it was a reflection of the tools available and the visual culture of that moment. Instagram had just launched. Pinterest was in its infancy. The dominant aesthetic was maximalist, heavily filtered, and obsessed with texture overlays.

I remember working at a boutique agency in 2011 where every single collage project required at least three of these elements: a grunge texture overlay, a vintage paper background, and photos with their edges "roughed up" to look like they'd been torn from a magazine. We'd add vignettes to everything. The drop shadow tool was our best friend. If a collage didn't have at least 15 visible elements, clients would ask us to add more because it looked "too simple."

What changed? Three major shifts happened between 2010 and now. First, mobile-first design forced us to simplify. When you're viewing content on a 6-inch screen, visual clutter becomes physically painful. Second, minimalism became the dominant aesthetic across design disciplines, from architecture to fashion to digital interfaces. Third—and this is crucial—printing and display technology improved so dramatically that we could finally showcase high-resolution images without compression artifacts, which meant we didn't need to hide poor image quality behind filters and effects.

The modern collage aesthetic prioritizes three things the 2010 version didn't: breathing room, cohesive color stories, and intentional hierarchy. When I look at collages from that era now, I see anxiety—a fear that empty space meant unfinished work. Today's professional collages embrace whitespace the way a luxury brand embraces simplicity. They understand that what you leave out is just as important as what you include.

Here's a concrete example: In 2010, if I was creating a travel collage, I might include 20-30 photos, each with a different filter, arranged in a scattered pattern with decorative elements like stamps, tickets, and handwritten fonts filling every gap. Today, that same collage might feature 5-7 carefully selected images, unified by a consistent color grade, arranged with generous margins, and perhaps one or two subtle graphic elements that serve a purpose rather than just filling space. The 2010 version would take 6 hours to create. The modern version takes 3 hours but requires far more critical thinking about what to exclude.

The Foundation: Selecting Images That Actually Work Together

The biggest mistake I see in amateur collages—and the one that immediately dates them—is treating image selection like a democratic process where every photo gets a vote. Professional collages are authoritarian. You're the curator, and most of your images don't make the cut.

"The collage work I do now looks nothing like what I created even five years ago—it's about restraint, intentionality, and understanding that negative space is just as important as the images themselves."

I use what I call the "restaurant menu principle." High-end restaurants typically offer 8-12 entrees, not 40. They've curated ruthlessly because they know that limitation creates focus and quality. When I'm building a collage for a client, I typically start with 100-150 candidate images and end up using 6-12. That's a 90% rejection rate, and it's necessary.

Here's my selection process: First, I export all candidates into a single folder and view them as large thumbnails. I'm looking for three specific qualities that must be present in every image I select. One: technical quality. The image must be sharp, properly exposed, and high-resolution (I never work with anything under 2000 pixels on the longest side). Two: visual interest. The image needs to have a clear subject or compelling composition—no "filler" shots. Three: color compatibility. This is where most people fail.

Color compatibility doesn't mean all your images need to be the same color. It means they need to exist in a harmonious color space. I use a technique I learned from a color theorist at Parsons: I convert all my candidate images to small thumbnails (about 100x100 pixels) and blur them heavily. At this size and blur level, you can't see details—only color masses. I arrange these blurred thumbnails next to each other and look for images that create a pleasing color flow. If an image's color mass clashes violently with the others, it gets cut, no matter how beautiful the actual photo is.

Let me give you specific numbers from a recent project. I was creating a collage for a boutique hotel's website redesign. They gave me access to 287 photos from their professional shoot. After my first pass eliminating technically flawed images, I had 156 candidates. After applying the blur test for color compatibility, I was down to 43 images. After considering composition and visual interest, I selected 9 final images for the hero collage. Those 9 images, arranged with intention, communicated more about the hotel's aesthetic than 50 randomly selected photos ever could.

One more critical point about selection: avoid the temptation to include images just because they're meaningful to you personally. I've had clients insist on including a blurry photo of their grandmother because of its sentimental value, even though it destroys the visual cohesion of the entire piece. If you're creating something for personal use, fine—include whatever you want. But if you're aiming for a professional look, sentiment cannot override visual quality. Create a separate, private collage for those meaningful-but-flawed images.

Mastering Layout: The Grid System That Changed Everything

In 2010, collage layouts were chaotic by design. Photos overlapped at random angles. Elements were scattered across the canvas with no underlying structure. It looked "creative" but it was actually just disorganized. The shift to professional-looking collages happened when designers started applying the same grid systems we use for magazine layouts and websites to collage work.

I work exclusively with modular grids now, and it's transformed my collage work. A modular grid divides your canvas into a series of equal-sized modules—think of it like graph paper for your design. The key is that all your images and elements align to this underlying structure, even if they span multiple modules. This creates visual rhythm and makes the collage feel intentional rather than accidental.

Here's how I set up a grid for a typical collage project: I start with a canvas size based on the final use case. For Instagram, that's 1080x1080 pixels. For print work, I typically work at 3000x4000 pixels at 300 DPI. I then divide this canvas into a 12-column grid with equal gutters (the spaces between columns). Why 12 columns? Because 12 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, and 6, which gives you maximum flexibility for different image sizes while maintaining alignment.

My gutter width is typically 2-3% of the total canvas width. So on a 3000-pixel-wide canvas, I'm using 60-90 pixel gutters. This might seem like a lot of empty space, but it's what separates professional work from amateur work. Those gutters create breathing room and prevent the claustrophobic feeling of 2010-era collages where every element touched its neighbor.

Within this 12-column grid, I create a hierarchy of image sizes. I typically use three size categories: hero images (spanning 6-8 columns), supporting images (spanning 3-4 columns), and accent images (spanning 2-3 columns). The hero image is your visual anchor—it's the largest, most compelling image in your collage, and it sets the tone for everything else. In a well-designed collage, your eye should land on the hero image first, then travel through the supporting images in a deliberate path.

Let me walk you through a specific example. Last year, I created a collage for a fashion brand's seasonal campaign. The canvas was 4000x5000 pixels with a 12-column grid and 80-pixel gutters. The hero image—a striking portrait of their lead model—spanned 8 columns and was positioned in the upper third of the canvas. Below it, I placed three supporting images: one spanning 4 columns showing a detail shot of the clothing, and two spanning 3 columns each showing lifestyle scenes. At the bottom, I added two accent images at 2 columns each, showing product details. Every single edge of every image aligned perfectly to the grid. The result looked effortless, but that underlying structure is what made it work.

One technique that's become my signature: the "broken grid." Once you've established a strong grid system, you can strategically break it with one element to create visual interest. This might be a single image that bleeds off the edge of the canvas, or an element that spans an unusual number of columns. But—and this is crucial—you can only break the grid effectively if you've established it first. Breaking a grid you never created just looks messy.

Color Grading: The Secret Weapon of Professional Collages

If I could give you only one piece of advice that would instantly elevate your collage work, it would be this: color grade everything. This single step is the difference between a collection of photos and a cohesive visual story. Yet I'd estimate that 95% of amateur collages skip this step entirely.

"Instagram had just launched. Pinterest was in its infancy. The dominant aesthetic was maximalist, heavily filtered, and obsessed with texture overlays."

Color grading means adjusting the colors in all your images so they share a consistent color palette and mood. Even if your photos were taken by the same photographer on the same day with the same camera, they'll have subtle color variations that create visual discord when placed side by side. Professional collages eliminate this discord through systematic color grading.

My color grading process happens in three stages. Stage one is global adjustment: I bring all images into Adobe Lightroom (though Capture One or even the free Darktable work fine) and apply a base adjustment that normalizes exposure and contrast. I'm not trying to make them look identical—I'm establishing a baseline. This typically involves setting a consistent white balance, adjusting the exposure curve to ensure no blown highlights or crushed shadows, and setting a standard contrast level.

Stage two is where the magic happens: color harmony adjustment. I choose a color story for the entire collage—this might be warm and golden, cool and moody, or vibrant and saturated. Then I adjust each image to fit that story. This doesn't mean making everything the same color; it means ensuring that the colors in each image complement the overall palette. I use the HSL (Hue, Saturation, Luminance) sliders extensively here. For example, if I'm going for a warm, sunset-inspired palette, I might shift all the blues toward teal, boost the saturation of oranges and yellows, and reduce the saturation of greens.

Here are the specific numbers I used for a recent editorial collage with a moody, cinematic feel: I shifted all hues 5-10 degrees toward blue in the shadows, reduced overall saturation by 15%, increased contrast by 20%, and applied a subtle split-toning effect with warm highlights (temperature +8) and cool shadows (temperature -12). These adjustments were applied to every single image in the collage, creating a unified look that felt intentional rather than accidental.

Stage three is individual refinement. After applying the global color story, I go through each image individually and make small adjustments to ensure it works within the composition. An image that will be placed next to a bright, warm photo might need slightly cooler tones to create contrast. An image in a less prominent position might need reduced saturation so it doesn't compete with the hero image.

One technique I use that I learned from a cinematographer: the "color echo." I identify the dominant color in my hero image—let's say it's a warm terracotta orange. Then I make sure that color appears in small amounts in at least three other images in the collage. This creates visual rhythm and helps tie the composition together. The human eye naturally follows color patterns, and this technique guides the viewer's gaze through your collage in a deliberate way.

A warning about presets and filters: the Instagram-style one-click filters that were popular in 2010 are a dead giveaway of amateur work. Professional color grading is custom and intentional. If you're using presets, use them only as a starting point, then adjust. And never, ever use different presets on different images within the same collage—that's a recipe for visual chaos.

Typography and Text Integration (When You Actually Need It)

Here's a controversial opinion from someone who's been doing this for over a decade: most collages don't need text at all. The 2010-era obsession with adding quotes, dates, and decorative typography to every collage was a mistake that made otherwise good work look cluttered and amateurish. That said, when text is necessary—for event invitations, promotional materials, or editorial work—it needs to be handled with extreme care.

The cardinal rule of typography in collages: less is exponentially more. If you're adding text, it should serve a clear purpose—providing essential information, creating hierarchy, or adding a single impactful message. Decorative text that exists just to fill space is the hallmark of dated design.

I follow a strict hierarchy system for text in collages. Primary text (headlines or the most important information) should be large, bold, and positioned in a high-visibility area—typically the upper third of the composition. I use font sizes that are at least 8-10% of the canvas height for primary text. Secondary text (supporting information or subheadings) should be 40-50% the size of primary text. Tertiary text (dates, credits, or fine print) should be minimal and unobtrusive, typically 20-30% the size of primary text.

Font selection is where I see the most mistakes. Comic Sans, Papyrus, and heavily decorative script fonts are immediate red flags. For professional collages, I stick to a simple rule: use no more than two font families, and make sure at least one is a clean, highly legible sans-serif. My go-to combinations are a modern sans-serif (like Helvetica Neue, Futura, or Montserrat) paired with either a classic serif (like Garamond or Freight Text) or a more distinctive display font for headlines only.

Here's a specific example from a wedding invitation collage I designed last year. The couple wanted to include their names, wedding date, and venue information. I used Futura Bold at 180 points for their names, positioned in the lower third of the collage where there was a natural gap between images. The wedding date was set in Futura Light at 72 points, positioned directly below the names. The venue information was set in Futura Book at 36 points at the very bottom. All text was set in a warm gray (not pure black, which would have been too harsh) that complemented the color-graded images. The entire text block occupied less than 15% of the total canvas area, but it was immediately readable and felt integrated rather than slapped on.

Text placement requires the same grid discipline as image placement. All text should align to your underlying grid structure. I typically create text boxes that span specific column widths—never arbitrary sizes. And I always ensure adequate padding around text elements. My minimum padding is equal to the x-height of the font (the height of a lowercase 'x'), which ensures the text has room to breathe.

One technique that's become standard in professional work: text as a compositional element rather than an overlay. Instead of placing text on top of images (which often requires adding shadows or backgrounds to maintain legibility), I position text in the negative space between images. This requires planning your layout with text in mind from the beginning, but the result is far more sophisticated. The text becomes part of the composition rather than an afterthought.

The Technical Details That Separate Amateurs from Professionals

Let's talk about the technical specifications that most people ignore but that make an enormous difference in the final result. These are the details that separate a collage that looks good on your phone from one that looks stunning in print or on a high-resolution display.

"Every single collage project required at least three of these elements: a grunge texture overlay, a vintage paper background, and photos with their edges 'roughed up' to look like they'd been torn from a magazine."

Resolution is the foundation. I never work with images below 2000 pixels on the longest side, and for print work, I require 3000+ pixels. When you're combining multiple images in a collage, you're often scaling them down, which means you need to start with more resolution than you think. A common mistake is creating a collage at 1080x1080 pixels (Instagram size) using images that are only 1200 pixels wide. When you scale those images down and crop them, you're losing quality. I always work at 2x the final output size, then scale down for delivery. This ensures crisp edges and no pixelation.

Color space management is something most amateurs never consider, but it's crucial for professional work. I work in Adobe RGB color space for all collage projects, even if the final delivery will be in sRGB (the standard for web). Why? Because Adobe RGB has a wider color gamut, which gives me more flexibility during color grading. I only convert to sRGB as the final step before export. For print work, I convert to CMYK using the specific color profile provided by the printer—never use generic CMYK conversion, as it will shift your colors unpredictably.

File formats matter more than you think. I work in PSD (Photoshop) or TIFF format during the creation process because these formats preserve layers and maintain maximum quality. I only export to JPEG or PNG for final delivery. When I do export to JPEG, I use quality settings of 90-95% (on a 0-100 scale)—never 100%, which creates unnecessarily large files, and never below 85%, which introduces visible compression artifacts. For web delivery with transparency needs, I use PNG-24. For print, I deliver TIFF files at 300 DPI.

Here's a specific workflow example: Last month, I created a collage for a magazine spread that would be printed at 11x14 inches. I set up my canvas at 4200x5400 pixels (double the final print size at 300 DPI). I worked with source images that were all at least 4000 pixels on the longest side. I did all my editing in Adobe RGB color space, maintaining layers throughout the process. When the design was approved, I flattened the layers, converted to the printer's specific CMYK profile, and exported as a TIFF file at 3300x4200 pixels (the final print size at 300 DPI). The printed result was razor-sharp with accurate colors.

Edge treatment is another technical detail that dramatically affects the professional appearance of your work. In 2010, it was trendy to add rough, torn edges to photos or use heavy vignettes. Today's professional standard is clean, precise edges. I use one of three edge treatments: hard edges (the image ends with a clean, straight line), subtle feathering (a 2-3 pixel soft edge that prevents harsh transitions), or deliberate geometric masks (circles, rounded rectangles, or custom shapes that serve a compositional purpose). I never use the "rough edge" or "torn paper" effects that were popular a decade ago—they instantly date your work.

Shadows and depth effects require restraint. If you're going to use drop shadows (and I rarely do), they should be subtle to the point of barely noticeable. My standard shadow settings: 2-3 pixel blur, 1-2 pixel distance, 15-20% opacity, and a shadow color that's a darker version of the background color rather than pure black. Most of the time, I skip shadows entirely and use subtle spacing to create depth instead.

Composition Principles That Create Visual Flow

A professional collage isn't just a collection of well-chosen, well-edited images arranged on a grid. It's a composition that guides the viewer's eye through a deliberate visual journey. This is where art direction separates from mere assembly.

I use the principle of visual weight to create hierarchy and flow. Visual weight is the perceived "heaviness" of an element based on its size, color, contrast, and position. Larger images have more visual weight. High-contrast images have more visual weight. Images positioned in the upper left (where Western readers naturally start) have more visual weight. I deliberately distribute visual weight across the composition to create balance and guide the eye.

Here's how this works in practice: In a recent collage for a restaurant's menu redesign, I placed the hero image—a striking overhead shot of their signature dish—in the upper left, spanning 6 columns of my 12-column grid. This image had high visual weight due to its size, position, and vibrant colors. To balance this, I placed a darker, more subdued image of equal size in the lower right. Between these two anchor points, I arranged smaller supporting images that created a diagonal flow from upper left to lower right. The viewer's eye naturally follows this path, taking in each image in sequence.

The rule of thirds applies to collages just as it does to individual photographs. I divide my canvas into thirds both horizontally and vertically, creating nine sections. The most important elements—typically my hero image or primary text—should be positioned at the intersections of these lines or along the lines themselves. This creates natural focal points that feel balanced and intentional.

Directional cues are a subtle but powerful tool. Images with strong directional elements—a person looking in a specific direction, a road leading into the distance, diagonal lines—create visual momentum. I use these directional cues to guide the viewer's eye through the composition. For example, if I have a portrait where the subject is looking to the right, I position that image on the left side of the collage so the gaze leads into the composition rather than out of it.

Rhythm and repetition create cohesion. I look for visual elements that repeat across multiple images—similar shapes, colors, or subjects—and use these repetitions to create rhythm. In a travel collage I created last year, I noticed that three of my selected images featured archways. I positioned these images at regular intervals across the composition, creating a rhythmic pattern that unified the piece. The viewer might not consciously notice this repetition, but it creates a subconscious sense of harmony.

Negative space is your friend, not your enemy. This is perhaps the biggest shift from 2010-era collages, which treated empty space as wasted space. In professional work, negative space serves multiple purposes: it gives the eye a place to rest, it creates emphasis on the elements that are present, and it conveys sophistication and confidence. I aim for at least 20-30% of my canvas to be negative space. This might seem like a lot, but it's what creates that "breathing room" that characterizes modern design.

Common Mistakes That Instantly Date Your Work

After reviewing hundreds of collages from aspiring designers and helping clients fix their DIY attempts, I've identified the specific mistakes that most reliably make work look dated or amateurish. Avoiding these pitfalls will immediately elevate your results.

Mistake number one: using too many images. There's an inverse relationship between the number of images in a collage and its perceived professionalism. More is not better. I've seen collages with 40+ images crammed into a single composition, and they universally look chaotic and dated. My rule: if you're creating a collage for social media or web use, use 5-9 images maximum. For print work where you have more space, you might go up to 12-15, but never more. Every image you add dilutes the impact of the others.

Mistake number two: inconsistent image quality. Mixing high-resolution professional photos with low-resolution phone snapshots creates jarring quality differences that scream amateur. If you don't have enough high-quality images, use fewer images rather than padding with low-quality ones. I once had a client insist on including a 800x600 pixel image in a collage where every other image was 4000+ pixels. That single low-quality image destroyed the professional appearance of the entire piece.

Mistake number three: over-reliance on effects and filters. Drop shadows, outer glows, bevel and emboss, gradient overlays—these effects were overused in 2010 and they're still overused today. If you're applying more than one effect to any element, you're probably overdoing it. The cleanest, most professional collages use minimal effects. When I do use effects, they're so subtle that most viewers wouldn't consciously notice them.

Mistake number four: ignoring color harmony. I see this constantly—collages that include a warm, golden-hour beach photo next to a cool, overcast mountain photo next to a vibrant, saturated street scene. These images might all be beautiful individually, but together they create visual discord. Every image in your collage should be color-graded to work within a unified color palette. This doesn't mean making everything the same color, but it does mean ensuring that the colors complement rather than clash.

Mistake number five: arbitrary rotation and overlapping. In 2010, it was trendy to rotate images at random angles and overlap them like scattered Polaroids. This look is dated. Modern professional collages use deliberate, grid-aligned layouts with clean edges and intentional spacing. If you're rotating an image, it should be at a specific angle (typically 90 degrees or a multiple thereof) for a compositional reason, not just to look "creative."

Mistake number six: decorative elements that serve no purpose. Borders, frames, clipart, decorative flourishes, texture overlays—these elements were everywhere in 2010 and they make work look instantly dated. If you're adding an element, ask yourself: does this serve a functional purpose (creating hierarchy, providing information, guiding the eye) or is it just decoration? If it's just decoration, remove it. Professional collages are ruthlessly functional.

Mistake number seven: poor typography choices and placement. Using more than two fonts, choosing decorative or script fonts for body text, placing text directly over busy images without ensuring legibility, using pure black text on white backgrounds—these are all typography mistakes that mark amateur work. Typography should be clean, legible, and integrated into the composition, not slapped on as an afterthought.

Tools and Software: What Professionals Actually Use

You don't need expensive software to create professional-looking collages, but you do need the right tools for your skill level and project requirements. Let me break down what I use and what I recommend for different scenarios.

For professional client work, I use Adobe Photoshop exclusively. It's the industry standard for a reason: it offers unmatched control over every aspect of the composition, from precise alignment tools to advanced color grading capabilities to layer management. I work with Photoshop CC (the subscription version), which costs $54.99/month for the Photography plan that includes Lightroom. Is it worth it? For professional work, absolutely. The time I save with Photoshop's advanced features pays for the subscription many times over.

My Photoshop workflow relies heavily on layers and smart objects. Every image in my collage is a separate layer, and I convert each to a smart object before making any transformations. This preserves the original image quality and allows me to make non-destructive edits. I use adjustment layers for color grading rather than applying adjustments directly to images. This workflow might seem complex, but it gives me complete flexibility to make changes without degrading image quality.

For color grading, I use Adobe Lightroom Classic before bringing images into Photoshop. Lightroom's color grading tools are more intuitive and powerful than Photoshop's, and the ability to sync adjustments across multiple images saves enormous amounts of time. I typically spend 30-45 minutes in Lightroom color grading all my candidate images before I even start the layout in Photoshop.

For clients who don't want to invest in Adobe's subscription, I recommend Affinity Photo. It's a one-time purchase of $69.99 and offers about 80% of Photoshop's functionality. The learning curve is similar, and it handles layers, smart objects, and color grading quite well. I've used it for personal projects and been impressed with the results. The main limitations are fewer advanced features and less robust file compatibility with other professional tools.

For quick social media collages or less complex projects, Canva Pro ($12.99/month) has become surprisingly capable. It's not suitable for high-end professional work, but for Instagram posts, Facebook graphics, or simple print projects, it offers templates, stock images, and an intuitive interface. The key is to ignore most of Canva's templates (which tend toward the dated aesthetic we're trying to avoid) and use it as a layout tool with your own images and minimal design elements.

I also use several specialized tools in my workflow. ColorSnap by Sherwin-Williams (free) helps me identify and match colors across images. Coolors.co (free) generates color palettes that I use as references for color grading. For grid systems, I use GuideGuide (free plugin for Photoshop) which makes creating complex grid layouts much faster than doing it manually.

One tool I don't recommend: automated collage makers and apps that promise "professional results in minutes." These tools (like Pic Collage, Photo Grid, or the collage features built into phone apps) use templates and algorithms that produce the exact dated aesthetic we're trying to avoid. They're fine for quick personal projects, but they can't produce professional-quality work because they don't give you the control needed for proper color grading, precise alignment, and intentional composition.

The truth is, the tool matters less than your understanding of design principles. I've seen beautiful collages created in free tools by designers who understand color, composition, and hierarchy. I've also seen terrible collages created in Photoshop by people who have access to professional tools but lack the knowledge to use them effectively. Invest in learning the principles first, then choose the tool that fits your budget and project needs.

That client with the 2010-style vision board? I spent three hours with her, teaching her the principles in this guide. We reduced her 30-image collage to 7 carefully selected photos. We color-graded everything to a cohesive warm palette. We built a clean grid layout with generous spacing. We removed all the decorative elements and replaced Comic Sans with Futura. The result was something she could actually use for her wedding invitations—something that looked intentional, sophisticated, and unmistakably modern. That's the power of understanding what makes collages work in 2026 versus what worked in 2010. The tools have evolved, but more importantly, our understanding of visual communication has matured. Apply these principles, and your collages will look professional, timeless, and worthy of the images they showcase.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, technology evolves rapidly. Always verify critical information from official sources. Some links may be affiliate links.